Search for: "Price v. USA"
Results 61 - 80
of 822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2011, 9:26 am
The Department of Justice has sued to stop the merger of AT & T, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc. on the grounds that the merger will have anticompetitive effects. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
Once substantive discovery does commence, I would expect it to proceed much faster than it has, for example, in the USA v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:39 am
In an April 26 decision District Judge Thomas Savage of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied the motion of Siemens Medical Solutions, USA, Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 2:18 am
Trans USA Products, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 11:07 pm
Kessler v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court in Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
A sampling: The Alliance for Natural Health USA, points out that when Makena was approved, K-V set a per-dose list price of $1,500 compared to $10 and $20 per dose for compounded 17 HPC. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
On Monday, June 27, 2011, the Supreme Court granted Certiorari in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
In SKF USA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
In the recent case of Beltronics USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:24 pm
Boltex Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:52 pm
January 28, 2013 In a decision in December, issued today (see: Green v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
’ ConocoPhillips Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 482 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2007); post here. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:17 pm
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 482 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2007). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 2:49 pm
” FTC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 2:34 pm
In the USA Today, Joan Biskupic has this preview of Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
The court relied on Price v. [read post]
