Search for: "Prior v. Warden"
Results 21 - 40
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2021, 6:28 am
The trial judge had vacated the verdict, the Court of Appeals brings it back, determining the jury had a basis to find the warden was aware of the civil rights violation.The case is Edwards v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:52 pm
Vannoy on whether the Supreme Court’s prior decision in Ramos v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:18 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm
Appeal of district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to enter judgment on PJC was not properly before Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:32 pm
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this section, the person is not eligible for parole during the mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this sectio [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this section, the person is not eligible for parole during the mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
Dunn v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
See Gomez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:10 pm
Exact federal drug penalties relate to specific drug type, quantities involved, and whether they are classified as schedule I, II, III, IV, or V drugs. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
These include prison officials, namely wardens and directors of corrections facilities. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:28 pm
Parks v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:43 am
Thus, the agency need not discover or identify each class member prior to conciliation or litigation. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:36 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
.), shall constitute a prior conviction under this subsection unless the defendant can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the conviction in the other jurisdiction was based exclusively upon a violation of a proscribed blood alcohol concentration of less than 0.08%.If the driving privilege of any person is under revocation or suspension for a violation of any provision of this Title or Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes at the time of any conviction for a violation of this… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
Additional Resources: Bowden v. [read post]
