Search for: "Pro Se Services Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 10:03 am
Most of these fail for insufficient allegations (a not-uncommon situation in pro se cases). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:26 am
Here, a pro se plaintiff filed his case in federal court. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:34 am
§ 1927 applies to pro se litigants. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:33 am
§ 1927 applies to pro se litigants. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 3:33 pm
American Airlines, Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
First, an attorney licensed in North Carolina can draft documents on behalf of a pro se party without appearing in the case. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:37 am
May 4, 2010) It's usually a drag to read opinions in pro se lawsuits. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 4:57 pm
PSKS, Inc. dba Kay's Kloset ("Leegin"). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:10 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:35 pm
Here Judge Posner notes that “(N)eedless to say, he was proceeding pro se. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:48 am
Route App, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Pro se plaintiff sued Meta seeking to hold it liable for allegedly removing certain “Muslim and/or Palestinian content” while preserving “unspecified Jewish and/or Israeli content” and for allegedly banning certain Muslim users, while allowing unspecified Jewish users to continue using Meta’s services. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:37 pm
By Eric Goldman [This is a relatively minor pro se case, which is why I've let it sit this long, but it has a couple of interesting facets that make the case worth blogging even at this late date.] [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:15 pm
The appellant Couture was pro se. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 5:57 am
Aug. 18, 2017), a pro se prison inmate filed an HCLA suit regarding an allegedly “botched surgical procedure performed on his lower back. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:09 am
Smartdevil is based in Canada, and its owner is apparently representing it pro se due to its "inability to procure reasonable representation" because "Smartdevil could not afford a minimum retainer fee of $50,000. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm
On April 20, 2006 the Applicant filed a trademark application for NATIONSTAR pro se with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 4:04 am
TTABlogger comment: Since the applicant appeared pro se, I decided not to label this a WYHA?. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 3:15 am
If a pro se plaintiff has made sufficiently diligent efforts to have the United States Marshal's Service serve a defendant within the relevant time period, then there is good cause for the plaintiff's failure to timely serve process. [read post]
