Search for: "Pro-Football, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2017, 3:56 pm
The second was federal district court Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of the Eastern District of Virginia in Pro-Football Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
As this trademark law is now unconstitutional after Tam, it appears that Pro-Football, Inc. will prevail in its dispute with the government over the cancelled registrations. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:59 pm
., Inc., 99 B.R. 768, 776-77 (N.D.Ohio 1989); In re Pro Football Weekly, Inc., 60 B.R. 824, 826-27 (N.D.Ill.1986); Broadhurst v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:54 am
The United States concurs with appellant Pro-Football, Inc., that oral argument is unnecessary. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 3:08 am
Pro-Football, Inc., the parent organization of the Washington team, argued that the Justices’ ruling left nothing for the lower courts to decide, so a summary ruling should be issued to direct a federal trial court to rule in favor of the team, without any further proceedings. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
The plaintiffs brought Title IX claims against a university alleging that they were sexually assaulted by members of its football team. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:39 pm
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2016lr.htmlHere are the articles featured this week: Offensive linemen: How Pro Football, Inc.'s responses to the cancellation of the Redskins registrations should be incorporated into the USPTO's future analyses of disparaging trademarks.Addressing the Oliphant in the room: Domestic violence and the safety of American Indian and Alaska Native children in Indian Country.U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:17 pm
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2016lr.html Here are the articles featured this week: Offensive linemen: How Pro Football, Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Representing the Rutherford Institute, they filed an amicus brief in this case in the Federal Circuit and a brief in Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:26 am
Its upcoming opinion could have wide-reaching effects, particularly on the controversial Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
The Court denied the extraordinary request for “certiorari before judgment” presented by Pro-Football Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:29 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:29 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:27 am
Challenge-flag thrown: the trademark trial and appeal board’s cancellation of the Redskins’ trademarks and pro-football’s chances on appeal. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am
Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm
Urban Outfitters, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:23 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:23 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:26 am
Pro-Football, Inc. petitioned the Court to skip the 4th Circuit and be joined to the Tam v. [read post]
