Search for: "Procter and Gamble Company" Results 1 - 20 of 528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 7:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Consolidated dominance: The consumer goods sector is largely dominated by a few conglomerates like Unilever, PepsiCo, and Procter & Gamble, which own a multitude of well-known brands. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
The Consumer Product Safety Commission recently announced a recall of some 8.2 million units of laundry detergent packets made by Proctor & Gamble, due to a packaging issue which may expose kids to "serious injury" or "death" if the contents are eaten.# # #Procter & Gamble Recalls 8.2 Million Defective Bags of Tide, Gain, Ace and Ariel Laundry Detergent Packets Distributed in US Due to Risk of Serious InjuryName of Product:Tide Pods, Gain… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Many cosmetics companies are already embracing our vision for a humane world where animal testing for cosmetics is eradicated, including industry heavyweights Lush, Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Avon and L’Oreal who have stood alongside us in our global campaign. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Among its signatories are major patent applicants to the EPO in recent years, such as Deutsche Telekom, Hoffmann-La Roche, HP, Eriksonn, Nokia, Procter & Gamble, Syngenta and Qualcomm. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Jo Dale Carothers
Well-known examples of trade secrets include the recipe for Coca-Cola, Google’s search algorithm, the recipe for Kentucky Fried Chicken, the WD-40 formula, the recipe for McDonald’s secret sauce, Hershey’s chocolate-making process, and Procter & Gamble’s consumer research methods. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:23 am by kblocher@hslf.org
With our Animal-Free Safety Assessment Collaboration partners—including Procter & Gamble, Kenvue, Unilever, ExxonMobil, Shell, Givaudan, Firmenich, Innospec, Sasol and the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals—we published several case-studies highlighting instances when unnecessary animal testing was requested by the European Chemicals Agency contradicting EU law. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:52 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
A few international corporations with headquarters in Japan include: Sony Toyota SoftBank Nintendo Mitsubishi There are also many American-based companies with offices in Japan in industries like tech  (Apple, Google, SAP, Amazon, Salesforce), finance (PwC, Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, EY, KPMG), and consumer packaged goods (Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Coca Cola, Kraft Heinz). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Seeger Weiss
Compensation for plaintiffs in the litigation now totals $533.5 million, including additional settlements with GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Procter & Gamble. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:22 am by kblocher@hslf.org
The legislation also has the endorsement of more than 390 individual companies including global beauty giants Unilever and Procter & Gamble, official supporters in the #BeCrueltyFree campaign to ban animal testing for cosmetics in all major global beauty markets.  More than 1,500 cruelty-free beauty brands are available in North America. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm by Bona Law PC
Parties, Transaction, Challenge, Settlement Both Amgen and Horizon are large pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
For example, the draft Merger Guidelines anticipate that a company can use acquisitions to strengthen its overall position across multiple products or services and thereby frustrate competition from companies who do not offer a similar array of products or services.[5] Such a theory could apply to any large company that is expanding into a new product area through acquisition. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by Jaikaran Singh and Kelsey Finn
The Procter & Gamble Company, No. 22-15080 (9th Cir. 2023) held that a food manufacturer could rely on an ingredients list panel located on the back of the challenged product packaging to determine whether an “ambiguous” phrase on the front label was misleading or deceptive. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Procter & Gamble Company, --- F.4th ----, 2023 WL 3911531, No. 22-15080 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 May 2023, 9:35 am by Bridget Crawford
  Procter & Gamble, which owns the Always brand, did not reply to requests for comment. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 10:30 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Many of the top beauty brands in the world—Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Avon, L'Oréal, Johnson & Johnson—have joined us, our longtime partner Lush Cosmetics and our local NGO partners to outlaw cosmetics testing on animals in many of the world’s most influential economies. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:24 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
KG, Procter&Gamble, Qualcomm, Roche, Siemens AG, Siemens Healthineers, Syngenta, Vodafone, Volvo) sent a letter to the EPO last month after a meeting with the management, in which they stated: ‘we feel that the search and examination quality of the EPO decreased in the last years’ and presented requests ‘that we would like to elaborate in detail with you in a further constructive dialogue’. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Postmaster Gen. of United States (6th Cir. 2019) ("Harm to reputation is insufficient to overcome the strong presumption in favor of public access…"); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]