Search for: "Promega Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 10:55 am by Joe Mullin
Here's how the case made it to the high court: Life Technologies Corporation, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, manufactures a genetic testing kit in the United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Joe Mullin
Both Promega Corporation and Life Technologies (selling through its Applied Biosciences brand) make DNA testing kits that can be used in a variety of fields, including forensic identification, paternity testing, medical treatment, and research. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:10 pm
Speakers are: Professor Mark Copelovitch, Political Science Department, UW-Madison Professor Menzie Chinn, La Follette School of Public Affairs, UW-Madison Professor Darian Ibrahim, UW Law School Sara Jensen, Promega Corporation, Madison To register, complete the registration form by March 20, 2009. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Life Technologies Corporation et al.,  and how, “this case provides a good reminder to corporate IP counsel to carefully review all tech transfer agreements during mergers or reorganizations. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Life Technologies Corporation et al.,  and how, “this case provides a good reminder to corporate IP counsel to carefully review all tech transfer agreements during mergers or reorganizations. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG) Inducement: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:10 am by Neha Mehta
Promega Corporation owns the Tautz patent, which claims a genetic testing toolkit comprising five components. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
Procedure – Timing of New Trial Motion: Promega Corporation v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG, awaiting government brief) 2. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Promega Corporation, the justices held that the supply of a single component of a multicomponent invention for manufacture abroad does not trigger liability under a provision of the Patent Act. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Promega Corporation, in which the justices held that the supply of a single component of a multicomponent invention for manufacture abroad does not trigger liability under a provision of the Patent Act. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG, awaiting government brief) Preclusion or Jurisdiction: BriarTek IP, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG, awaiting government brief) Inducement: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG, awaiting government brief) Inducement: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG, awaiting government brief) Inducement: Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Promega last Term), the SG's brief recommending cert seems to expand the issue to all damages.Another case to watch is Mentor Graphics v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Promega last Term), the SG's brief recommending cert seems to expand the issue to all damages.Another case to watch is Mentor Graphics v. [read post]