Search for: "Prominent Ticket Service, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
With a number of prominent prospective candidates saying no thanks in recent months, some No Labels members and leaders have grown frustrated with the failure to advance a ticket. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 8:35 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Cypress Gardens Inc., 208 USPQ 288 (TTAB 1980) (name CORKY THE CLOWN used on handbills found to function as a mark to identify live performances by a clown, where the mark was used to identify not just the character but also the act or entertainment service performed by the character); In re Carson, 197 USPQ 554 (TTAB 1977) (individual’s name held to function as mark, where specimen showed use of the name in conjunction with a reference to services and … [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 8:35 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Cypress Gardens Inc., 208 USPQ 288 (TTAB 1980) (name CORKY THE CLOWN used on handbills found to function as a mark to identify live performances by a clown, where the mark was used to identify not just the character but also the act or entertainment service performed by the character); In re Carson, 197 USPQ 554 (TTAB 1977) (individual’s name held to function as mark, where specimen showed use of the name in conjunction with a reference to services and … [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The documents also reveal that justices have lent the prestige of their positions to partisan activity, headlining speaking events with prominent politicians, or advanced their own personal interests, such as sales of their books, through college visits. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
US Lawmakers Resume Globetrotting Paid by Special Interests Yahoo News – Billy House (Bloomberg) | Published: 3/18/2023 Members of Congress and their staffers rebounded from pandemic travel anxiety in 2022, accepting more than $6.6 million worth of airline tickets, hotel rooms, and meals paid for by special-interest groups. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:22 am by Mitchell Stabbe
” sweepstakes or giveaways that offer tickets to a tournament game as a prize Example:  even if the sweepstakes name is not a problem, offering game tickets as a prize will raise an objection by the NCAA due to language on the tickets prohibiting their use for such purposes. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Under its action group, the CLC filed a number of prominent lawsuits in 2021. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a series of Facebook ads promoting Trainor’s appearance, the Denton County Republican Party made no mention of his service on the FEC. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 7:44 pm by Mitchell Stabbe
” sweepstakes or giveaways that offer tickets to a tournament game as a prize Example: even if the sweepstakes name is not a problem, offering game tickets as a prize will raise an objection by the NCAA. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:08 am by Richard Marsolais
They had purchased airline tickets to arrive on Tuesday and return on Wednesday after the first round. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Mitchell Stabbe
” sweepstakes or giveaways that offer tickets to a tournament game as a prize Example: even if the sweepstakes name is not a problem, offering game tickets as a prize will raise an objection by the NCAA. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:30 am by Kristian Soltes
Recent steps by Walmart Inc., the world’s largest retailer, to create a fintech division has sent shivers across Wall Street. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
  For example, a violation of a court order to pay a fine may place an individual on a list of untrustworthy persons which then is used to prohibit the individual from purchasing airplane tickets. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 7:21 am by Mitchell Stabbe
” sweepstakes or giveaways that offer tickets to a tournament game as a prize Example: the sweepstakes name may not be a problem, but including game tickets as a prize will raise an objection by the NCAA. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
American Express Co., a big-ticket antitrust case over the credit-card company’s contractual provisions with merchants. [read post]