Search for: "Proper Polymers" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Even if reasonable expectation of success is a proper test in such a situation, what is the success for which there must be a reasonable expectation? [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:09 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  In other cases, it was added to adhesives and polymer-based materials to strengthen things like tiles and to be used in wall board joinery. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Michael Grossman
Smith & Wesson, a widely-known and trusted firearms maker since its inception in 1852, created its polymer-based M&P15-22 variant in 2009, and has enjoyed its widespread success in the marketplace. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:11 am by Schachtman
Wright’s opinion, based upon his review of the clinical literature, was scientifically and legally unreliable because he had not conducted a proper systematic review. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:15 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
However, additional circumstantial evidence, such as proof of proper use, handling or operation of the product and the nature of the malfunction, may be enough to satisfy the requirement that something was wrong with it…Further, a defective condition can also be proven by the testimony of an expert who has examined the product or who offers an opinion on the products design. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The asserted claims of both patents coverethylene polymer compositions (a type of plastic) with,inter alia, improved modulus, yield strength, impactstrength, and tear strength. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Marty Miller
Teva on remand The claims at issue in Teva were directed to a particular polymer having a “molecular weight of about 5 to 9 kilodaltons. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
The confusion arises now because the patentee is arguing that the proper definition is peak average. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
§ 1983 authorizes the imposition of supervisory liability for a subordinate’s alleged constitutional violation and (2) whether there is a clearly established right under the Eighth Amendment to the proper implementation of adequate suicide prevention protocols. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
NOVA Chemicals Corp 2014 FC 844 Justice O’Keefe found there was no explicit Promise for a specific result, such that a “mere scintilla” of utility was sufficient for Dows’ polymer patent. [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:18 pm by Dennis Crouch
However, this practical approach to scope is in line with the Court’s prior decision in Marine Polymer Tech. v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE:    DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY    Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:25 pm by Audrey A Millemann
  The claim at issue referred to a polymer having a specific molecular weight. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:57 am by Martin Miller
The polymerization process, especially for large polymers, is not always precise with respect to how many monomers are joined together in each polymer chain. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
As such, the court found those obviousness rejections proper. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
” Writing for the National Law Journal’s Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports on yesterday’s oral argument in M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by Ronald Mann
From that perspective, the briefs in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:16 am
Indiana patent lawyers for Berry argued that this was proper because Intertape had engaged in inequitable conduct or defrauded the USPTO. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:08 pm
” [, therefore, a proper interpretation is that the inner and outer matrices must be “separate and distinct” such that they retain their claimed properties and are consistent with their respective group limitations]Id. at *14 (text added). [read post]