Search for: "Proper Polymers" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 8:18 pm by Dennis Crouch
However, this practical approach to scope is in line with the Court’s prior decision in Marine Polymer Tech. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:25 pm by Audrey A Millemann
  The claim at issue referred to a polymer having a specific molecular weight. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Stu Ellis
  Fertility specialists say late season applications can still be made with good yield results, if the proper type of nitrogen is used, and if rainfall can move it into the root zone. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
Furthermore, if a certain fraction derived from a prior art polymer has properties that fall within the scope of the claims, does this polymer then make the composition as claimed available to the public? [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 25 Conference) M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 11:04 am
During its contact lens solution research and development phase, Alcon discovered an active called polyquaternium-1 (PQ-1), a polymer that provided a unique combination of lubrication and disinfection capabilities in a single ingredient, and a unique polymer that was relatively cornea friendly. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:58 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  The problem occurs when companies rush dangerous defective artificial hips onto the market without taking the time to do proper and required safety testing. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
Appellants merely state that the art does not teach or suggest a vulcanized polymer having a Shore A hardness of 90 or less. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
The confusion arises now because the patentee is arguing that the proper definition is peak average. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Even if reasonable expectation of success is a proper test in such a situation, what is the success for which there must be a reasonable expectation? [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
Rules of Interpretation (“ARIs”), “govern the proper classification of all merchandise and are applied in numerical order. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Pearl River Polymers, Inc., 668 F.3d 1340, 1343 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 10:41 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
In general, applicants who qualify for visa interview waivers are instructed to mail in and submit the following documents: A valid passport The applicant’s previous passport with their last issued U.S. visa (if applicable) The applicant’s DS-160 confirmation page The applicant’s courier-in receipt accessed via their AIS portal A passport photo taken within the last six months and in the proper format Applicants under 14 years old must also submit a copy of their… [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:01 pm
Along this line, it should be noted that plaintiff has failed to establish its prima facie right to judgment as it has failed to demonstrate its timely and proper submission of the claims in question See, Presbyterian Hospital, supra , 90 NY2d 274 (1997), Elmont Open MRI & Diagnostic Radiology v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
Celanese Polymer Specialties Co., 840 F.2d 1565, 1572 (Fed. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:15 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
However, additional circumstantial evidence, such as proof of proper use, handling or operation of the product and the nature of the malfunction, may be enough to satisfy the requirement that something was wrong with it…Further, a defective condition can also be proven by the testimony of an expert who has examined the product or who offers an opinion on the products design. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:04 pm
The court stated: We agree with the district court that the proper construction is “anion derived from a mineral acid. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Sydney Ross Singer
This same polymer is the common “polyester” used in apparel and other textiles. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm by Jessica Kroeze
Consequently, the decision of the first instance not to admit D6 and D7 into the proceedings was overturned.The Board did not admit the second to nineteenth auxiliary requests of the proprietor - already filed during first instance proceedings -  to the proceedings for lack of proper substantiation.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]