Search for: "Public Defender Service Corporation, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 1,994
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, regarding the illegality of [similar] swapping schemes under the AKS. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
To Egilman, it was obvious that material forces of capitalism meant that manufacturing industry was incapable of honestly defending its products. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Custodia has a Special Purpose Depository Institution (SPDI) charter from the State of Wyoming that allows it to take deposits but does not require it to obtain insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Trump for President, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 1560462 (Colo. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 5:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
New Match will remain a public corporation but now will only have one class of common. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[3] The ALI’s Principles also recognize that a “reasonable amount” of corporate wealth may be donated or otherwise allocated toward “public welfare, humanitarian, educational, and philanthropic purposes. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” Its products and services are used as an alternative to traditional metal detectors at schools and other public locations. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The SEC’s March 18, 2024, Administrative Order against Delphi (USA) Inc. can be found here. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Court found that the defendants—Musk, Tesla, Inc. and six individual directors—failed to meet their burden to prove that the Grant was “entirely fair,” the standard under Delaware law that the Court applied in light of the Court’s determination that Musk held controlling stockholder status with respect to the Grant. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Court found that the defendants—Musk, Tesla, Inc. and six individual directors—failed to meet their burden to prove that the Grant was “entirely fair,” the standard under Delaware law that the Court applied in light of the Court’s determination that Musk held controlling stockholder status with respect to the Grant. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
I would wager the agency struggled to defend in its position in the first place precisely because company names are inherently “identifying” and not intrinsically “commercial. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
However, this time, Bouvier was not a defendant in this case. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Plan sponsors have no incentive to overpay for health plan services because it is a material corporate expense. [read post]