Search for: "Puckett v. United States"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 7:02 am
The Court has released the opinion in Puckett v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 Wednesday in Puckett v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:21 pm
United States (07-9712), the case before the Supreme Court involving the government breach of a plea agreement regarding arguments to be made at sentencing. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 10:59 am
The transcript of the argument in Puckett v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
In Puckett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Following the release of any opinions, the Court will hear argument in Puckett v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
United States (sentencing, plain error doctrine) Boyle v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 1:54 pm
Puckett v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
HIF Bio, Inc. (07-1437) and United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
United States (07-1601; 07-1607), Puckett v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
United States (07-1601; 07-1607), Puckett v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:56 pm
Puckett v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
United States; Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
This is the version that will appear in the United States Reports, the official record of the Court’s opinions. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 23, 2008 Puckett v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court, in Phillips Petroleum Co. v Shutts (472 US 797, 810-811 [1985]), succinctly addressed not only the status of an absent class action plaintiff, but also the relative detachment, and concomitant security, that characterizes that plaintiff's involvement in the litigation. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]
