Search for: "Purdue Pharma Technologies Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
Click-to-Call Technologies, LP (2020)"; "Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
Civil enforcement actions against the parties responsible for triggering and fueling the opioid epidemic are a critical part of the department’s ongoing efforts to address this crisis.Consistent with this focus, the largest False Claims Act settlements in the past year resulted from significant resolutions with prescription opioid manufacturers: Indivior Inc. and Indivior plc (Indivior), and Purdue Pharma (Purdue). [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
” The state of Arkansas sued dozens of drug makers and distributors, including Purdue Pharma Inc., over their role in the opioid epidemic. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Epic Pharma, LLC, 16-289 (whether the circumstances of invention can help prove non-obviousness) (The Purdue and Grunenthal cases stem from the same Federal Circuit decision but involve separate patents owned by the respective petitioners) Claim Construction: CSP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
, No. 16-296 (OxyContin patent – when is an element ‘inherently’ disclosed by the prior art for anticipation purposes) Obviousness: Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Epic Pharma, LLC, 16-289 (whether the circumstances of invention can help prove non-obviousness) (The Purdue and Grunenthal cases stem from the same Federal Circuit decision but involve separate patents owned by the respective petitioners) Claim Construction: CSP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Claim Construction: CSP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
, No. 16-296 (OxyContin patent – when is an element ‘inherently’ disclosed by the prior art for anticipation purposes) Obviousness: Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm
Claim Construction: CSP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:04 am
Purdue Pharma Technologies, Inc. 51. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:43 am
The appellant Purdue Pharma was represented by:GREGORY A. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:59 pm
Laboratories Inc.; Purdue Pharmaceuticals LP; Rhodes Technologies • Defendant: Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Janssen and Teva file to protect Chicago disclosing trade secrets: Back in the summer, the city of Chicago commenced proceedings against several pharmaceutical companies, including Janssen, Purdue Pharma LP, Teva and Actavis alleging that they dishonestly marketed opioid painkillers including Oxycontin and Percocet for the treatment of common and non-cancer related chronic pain resulting in a reported public health crisis of addiction and abuse. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
In ABC, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:55 am
See, e.g., Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 8:26 pm
Laboratories, Inc.; Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.; Rhodes Technologies • Defendant: Epic Pharma, LLC Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:46 am
Purdue Pharma Technologies, Inc.51. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:35 pm
Laboratories, Inc.; Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.; Rhodes Technologies • Defendants: Varam, Inc.; KVK-Tech, Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:34 pm
Laboratories, Inc., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., Rhodes Technologies, Board of Regents of the University of Texas Systems, Grunenthal GMBH • Defendant: Sandoz Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Purdue Pharma Co., 297 F. [read post]
