Search for: "Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. " Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
, No. 16-296 (OxyContin patent – when is an element ‘inherently’ disclosed by the prior art for anticipation purposes) Obviousness: Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
, No. 16-296 (OxyContin patent – when is an element ‘inherently’ disclosed by the prior art for anticipation purposes) Obviousness: Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Almost from the day this blog was founded, we’ve been arguing that class actions have no place in prescription medical product liability litigation. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Purdue Pharma, L.P., 821 N.E.2d 141, 146 (Ohio 2004); Vaccariello v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
A reader recently recommended that we take a look at Rounds v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
A couple of cases we've posted about recently started us thinking - a dangerous turn of events, we know. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
This is the third installment of “Petitions to watch” featuring cases up for consideration at the Court’s September 29 “Long Conference. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Things are often done differently down in Louisiana. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., 342 P.3d 847 (Ariz App. 2015), once, here. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by Schachtman
For the last 30 years, Campion has been on the faculty in Purdue University. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Ok, we've worried about what might happen if our side (the defense, for any new readers) were to lose the preemption wars currently in progress before the Supreme Court. [read post]