Search for: "QUANTUM SERVICING CORP." Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2021, 9:01 am by Caroline Henrie (CA)
Manson’s decision in Trans-High Corp v Hightimes Smokeshop and Gifts Inc, 2013 FC 1190, to determine the quantum of damage and costs in a proceeding where the respondent has been uncooperative and absent. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant must affirmatively demonstrate the absence of one of the elements of legal malpractice (see Quantum Corporate Funding, Ltd. v Ellis, 126 AD3d 866, 871). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:01 am by Caroline Henrie (CA)
Manson’s decision in Trans-High Corp v Hightimes Smokeshop and Gifts Inc, 2013 FC 1190, to determine the quantum of damage and costs in a proceeding where the respondent has been uncooperative and absent. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co (Internet Cases)   US Patents – Decisions District Court N D California orders stay in patent infringement case filed by Rambus against Micron, Samsung and Nanya (IP Watchdog) (Law360) District Court N D California: Judge denies Hynix bid to revisit Rambus ruling (Law360)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cisco Systems – Teles accuses Cisco of infringing newly issued patent relating to transmission of… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
EXPEDIA, INC.; ORBITZ, LLC; INTERNETWORK PUBLISHING CORP., d/b/a Lodging.com; TRAVELOCITY.COM, LLP; PRICELINE.COM, INC.; TRAVELWEB LLC, HOTWIRE, INC.; HOTELS.COM, L. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
Hill was probably not thinking about the philosophical problems invoked by quantum physics when he incorrectly branded temporality as not necessary. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH has already attracted a lot of attention, not least because some good souls have rather forgotten that, while the Advocate General is a member of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and his rulings, always influential, are adopted by the CJEU in an estimated 75-80% of intellectual property cases, his Opinions are not actually the rulings of the court. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
  On defendants' motions to dismiss, the court dismissed the complaint against the Medtrex defendants and the quantum meruit and fraud causes of action against defendants ACMDPC and Carothers. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
Full Federal Court issues ruling in Hansen Beverage Company v Bickford’s (Australia) Pty Ltd (IP Down Under) Elvis Presley Enterprises opposition to Elvis Jelcic’s application to register ElvisFinance for financial services fails (IPKat)   Canada Canada-EU Free Trade Agreement – consultation deadline 20 January 2009 (Excess Copyright)   China Coming up: China-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement (IP Dragon) USTR releases 2008 report on… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state courts”]). [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:01 am by Raquel Leslie, Brian Liu
The agency is also currently reviewing whether China-controlled Pacific Networks Corp. and its ComNet (USA) LLC unit pose similar risks to U.S. national security. [read post]