Search for: "Qualcomm Incorporated "
Results 1 - 20
of 229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 8:26 am
The approved systems include offerings from Qualcomm Incorporated, Federated Wireless, Inc., Sony Group Corporation, Comsearch, the Wi-Fi Alliance Services Corporation, the Wireless Broadband Alliance, Inc., and Broadcom Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:30 am
Notable customers previously included Qualcomm and Texas Instruments. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm
Qualcomm Incorporated et al., S.D. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 2:05 am
Companies from Meta to Qualcomm to Microsoft have heavily invested in the technology for years. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:20 am
I agree with the Qualcomm executive who said that everyone involved with LNGs should go to jail. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
If anything, Apple has a long-term plan to keep SEP royalties down, and in the mid term it may be interesting to see what happens if Apple uses its own baseband processors and then negotiates a new patent license with Qualcomm. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am
Lenovo FRAND judgment (which was a much better outcome for the defendant than for the plaintiff) acknowledged in para. 168 that it's neither fair nor feasible: "For my part, I do not see how one can eliminate or distinguish the value of an invention being incorporated into a standard from the invention itself. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:56 pm
Cal.): Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated's Motion for Summary Judgment (Redacted) Talking about different types of pretrial motions, large parts of that motion look at first sight like a Daubert motion for taking aim at law professor Elhauge's expert testimony--and quite extensively so. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
So far, patent holders such as Qualcomm were pretty confident that a covenant to sue last would not entail patent exhaustion under U.S. patent law. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:44 am
The top three are Mediatek, Qualcomm, and Apple, but UNISOC has a greater market share than Samsung (which actually incorporates UNISOC chips into the Galaxy A series) and Huawei's HiSilicon combined (the latter is obviously affected by geopolitics). [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:51 am
But it still doesn't justify judicial overreach with respect to foreign patents.Another part of the decision that I find really odd is that he disagrees with Nokia's argument that "end user" (a term in that meanwhile-expired Nokia-Qualcomm agreement) unambiguously means drivers that operate automobiles as opposed to car makers that incorporate Conti's telematics control units (TCUs) into their products. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
by Dennis Crouch It is time to pick-up our consideration of Supreme Court patent cases for the 2022-2023 term. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 8:19 am
At the end of the day, Apple resolved the problem by incorporating Qualcomm instead of chips in its IPhones 7 and 8. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 4:23 am
The history of phones has been linked to patents ever since Alexander Graham Bell patented the telephone in 1876. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 21-1327 (appellate standing – same question as the already denied parallel Apple v Qualcomm petition); CustomPlay, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am
Three of the most important wireless innovators--Ericsson (which is continuously making headway in its 5G patent dispute with Apple), Qualcomm, and Nokia--call out Apple on its standard-essential patent (SEP) devaluation crusade. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:16 pm
Qualcomm Incorporated (licensee appellate standing) and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:35 pm
Gilstrap perfectly reasonably severed the FRAND claims from that case (and incorporated them into Ericsson's earlier-filed FRAND actions as compulsory counterclaims), Apple was no longer interested in pursuing its own requests for declaratory judgment. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:07 am
Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 21-1327. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 9:21 am
Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 21-746 (CVSG requested February 22, 2022). [read post]
