Search for: "Quantum Communications Ltd" Results 61 - 80 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2010, 5:21 pm
Co., Ltd., 927 F.2d 1200, 1206 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
[…] [T]here is an irresistible inference in the absence of any further explanation that Facebook (UK) Ltd was established to service Facebook and is part of the wider Facebook group of companies”[90]. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IPKat) Roya Ghafele's report 'Perceptions of Intellectual Property: A Review' highlights pressures facing the IP brand; new group gets ready to act (IAM) Progress in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee seen in informal sessions (Intellectual Property Watch) WIPO Committee on Traditional Knowledge and Folklore running in place (Intellectual Property Watch) WIPO Director General calls for concrete outcomes to benefit indigenous and local communities (WIPO) (Intellectual… [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As the Act prohibits a person or entity providing an electronic communication service to the public from knowingly divulging to any person or entity the contents of a communication while in electronic storage by that service, Plaintiffs brought a class action for breach or privacy. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
The New York Times reports on the race to develop stronger encryption techniques as the field of quantum computing continues to advance. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by Durga Rao
Below is the extract of the judgment of the Company Law Board, Delhi which has come in rescue of the persons who have invested in the Company thinking that they would be allotted proportionate shares. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
He subsequently abandoned the defences and the court’s sole task was to determine the quantum of damages. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
DLT Entertainment LTD., No. 14 Civ. 568 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
In Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB) Nicol J outlined that where there is an allegation of serious criminality, clear evidence is required. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
  The judge had already given permission to appeal on quantum. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Falls Media, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB Precedential No 15: TTAB affirms rejection of website specimen for goods, ordering information lacking: In re Quantum Foods, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB enters summary judgment: Applicant lacked bona fide intent to use FEAR TH [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 19 December 2023 there was a summary judgment application in the case of Sinton -v- Maybourne Hotels Ltd KB-2023-000257 before Chamberlain J. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Ltd. has held that the Copyright Board would not have any jurisdiction to pass an interim order in a pending complaint. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The final step is to assess the quantum of the damages. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Preamble This post is the fourth of a series considering three major issues under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: the impact of how the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has defined rights; the relationship between rights; and the relationship between guarantees of rights and freedoms and section 1 of the Charter. [read post]