Search for: "Quantum Communications Ltd"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
The Supreme Court case details are here and our case preview is here.On Thursday 31 March, Lords Walker, Collins and Kerr will hear a permission to appeal in respect of Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors (UK) Ltd. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
But, ED was involved in a long-standing dispute with IBEW over exclusivity of bargaining rights, which dispute had culminated in an 18-day hearing before the Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) the previous year; a decision from the OLRB was pending at the time of ED’s communications with Naylor. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
But, ED was involved in a long-standing dispute with IBEW over exclusivity of bargaining rights, which dispute had culminated in an 18-day hearing before the Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) the previous year; a decision from the OLRB was pending at the time of ED’s communications with Naylor. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:02 am
Burns Lake Community Development Assn. [1996] B.C.J. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
It was thus submitted that:...once you have a basic right in the context of a s 62G order not to answer questions, then it’s not a quantum leap, it’s not a substantial move to conclude, well, that right must necessarily involve legal advice. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
But the time it takes for a case to reach this stage varies substantially from 3 months (Ali v Associated Newspapers 2010 EWHC 100 (QB)) to 28 months (Kaschke v Gray 2010 EWHC 1907 (QB)) and it may well be that in many of the judgments in favour of the claimant, quantum remains in issue. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
., Ltd. for an earth shattering, body-slamming $403 million dollars. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:34 am
For those purposes, there is no absolute requirement that a complainant communicate the nature of the disability to her or his employer: Sylvester v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Falls Media, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB Precedential No 15: TTAB affirms rejection of website specimen for goods, ordering information lacking: In re Quantum Foods, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB enters summary judgment: Applicant lacked bona fide intent to use FEAR TH [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
When Mr Havers QC for the government sought to exclude the press, Dyson LJ suggested that there should be reporting restrictions but reporters could not be excluded GUR v Avrupa Newspaper Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 594, Dyson LJ gave the leading judgment in this case in which the Court dismissed an appeal on quantum in libel case. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:21 pm
Co., Ltd., 927 F.2d 1200, 1206 (Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Below is the extract of the judgment of the Company Law Board, Delhi which has come in rescue of the persons who have invested in the Company thinking that they would be allotted proportionate shares. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm
Galloway v Jewish Communications Ltd July 2008, Eady J. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Neo-Neon Int'l, Ltd. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
BMX Worlwide, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:42 pm
Massage, Reiki and other CAM therapies help cancer patients.So reports a local paper: The course of treatment Sue Sells began early this year was brutal. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co (Internet Cases) US Patents – Decisions District Court N D California orders stay in patent infringement case filed by Rambus against Micron, Samsung and Nanya (IP Watchdog) (Law360) District Court N D California: Judge denies Hynix bid to revisit Rambus ruling (Law360) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cisco Systems – Teles accuses Cisco of infringing newly issued patent relating to transmission of… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd,… [read post]
