Search for: "R & S Management, Inc. et al v. U.S. Structures, Inc."
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
First, the rule allows voting stockholders to make their own ad hoc choice of nominees from the slates proposed by management, on one hand, and by the nominating stockholder, on the other. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency today announced that High Steel Structures, Inc. and its sister company High Concrete Group, LLC, have settled alleged violations of toxic chemical reporting requirements at their plants in Lancaster, Williamsport and Denver, Pa. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Here is Dan’s guest post. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
I am concerned, though, that sophistication is not quite the safeguard it’s presumed to be. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Capital stock taxes are also nonneutral, as different industries and business structures have vastly different asset mixes. [read post]
