Search for: "R.C." Results 1 - 20 of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
In order to better visualize the changes, an excerpt from revised R.C. 5713.03 is re-produced below: “Sec. 5713.03. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:58 am by Rohit De
Cooper enters the annals of Indian legal history as the main petitioner in the Bank Nationalisation cases (R.C Cooper v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:25 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that pursuant to Ohio’s multiple-count statute: a defendant’s conviction for felonious assault based on causing serious physical harm [R.C. 2903.11(A)(2)] is an allied offense of an attempt to commit murder while committing an offense of violence [R.C. 2903.02(B) and 2923.02]; a defendant’s conviction for felonious assault based upon causing or attempting to cause physical harm by means of a deadly weapon [R.C.… [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:03 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that when a criminal defendant who has successfully completed a program of intervention in lieu of conviction (ILC) moves for an order sealing his or her record under R.C. 2951.041(E), the trial court has discretion either to grant the motion immediately under R.C. 2953.52(A)(1), or to impose a waiting period before the record is sealed pursuant to R.C. 2953.32(A)(1). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:04 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that a determination by the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) pursuant to R.C. 3314.015 (B)(3) that an organization is not “education oriented” and therefore is not eligible to sponsor a community school is subject to appeal in accordance with R.C. 119.12. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:20 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled unanimously today that when an applicant with multiple convictions under one case number moves to seal his or her criminal record in that case pursuant to R.C. 2953.32, and one of those convictions is exempt from sealing pursuant to R.C. 2953.36, the trial court may not seal the remaining convictions. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 6:08 am by Legal Profession Prof
Respondent and R.C., who occupied adjacent cubicles, had an... [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether R.C. 124.27(B) or R.C. 124.56 can support Greeley claims for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm by MBettman
  Because we have had formatting issues with the emails since the change in our design, the emails will now just include the blog headline and a link to … Continue reading → The post Merit Decision: Judgment Creditor of City Employee Cannot Assert Right of Indemnification Against the City Under R.C.2744.07. [read post]