Search for: "RANDY RAMSEY" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 8:16 pm by Jack Chin
Neal Katyal and Paul Clement, Michael Ramsey, Randy Barnett, and many others, persuasively argue (and this is a paraphrase) that if Congress makes a person a full member of the U.S. political community at birth, that person is a natural born citizen. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:03 am
He also served in the Mayor Randy Kelly's administration as Director of Neighborhood Improvement. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:52 am by Lawrence Solum
Mike Rappaport blogs today on the marvelous conference that he and Mike Ramsey organized at the University of San Diego. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:30 am by Charles Abut
In his ongoing divorce case, pending since 2004, 77-year old Frankie Valli, of Four Seasons fame, is said to be earning more than $500,000 per month, from Jersey Boys and other residuals, while his estranged wife, Randy, aged 51, continues to receive $30,000 per month in temporary support. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:22 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Former solicitors general Neal Katyal and Paul Clement reached the same conclusion, as has Randy Barnett. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Randy Barnett
He then says: Randy notes that in our debate, which he links to, that I had only given arguments against one construction approach. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:58 am by Lawrence Solum
 There is a terrific lineup--with papers by Kurt Lash, Randy Barnett, Jack Balkin, James Fleming, Thomas Lee, Garrett Epps, and me, and comments from John Harrison, Michael Kent Curtis, Thomas Merrill, Keith Whittington, Jack Rakove, Michael Ramsey, and Larry Alexander.Michael Rappaport and Michael Ramsey organized the conference, and I wanted to thank them both for doing such a terrific job! [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
Professor Mike Ramsey has an interesting response to my previous post on constraint vs deference: The problem with judicial restraint (meaning simply deference to legislative majorities) as an interpretive philosophy is that it isn’t an interpretive philosophy. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:10 pm
It was organized my friends Michael Rappaport and Michael Ramsey and was of extremely high quality. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:33 pm by Randy Barnett
For his part, Balkin makes what I think is the strongest originalist argument for why Cruz does qualify (which Michael Ramsey presents here). [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 5:50 pm by JB
Moreover, doing so would only bump me up two or three slots in his lists.However, the lesson here is that if you have ever written under more than one name (whether first or last), you should let Greg Sisk know in advance.There are, however, some amusing effects of using the correct citation counts.First, updating this list of most cited originalist scholars courtesy of Michael Ramsey, I am now the most cited originalist in the American legal academy.Second, among the top five most cited… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 8:06 am by Randy Barnett
… Professor Ramsey then offers these thoughts (which nicely capture my initial reaction): I’m struck by how uncompromising this is. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:58 am by Mike Rappaport
  Mike Ramsey and I put the conference together, and let me tell you, running it required an enormous amount of work. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
” Responding to this has been excellent posts by Michael Ramsey, Ilya Somin and Evan Bernick. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 11:43 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Last week, I joined with Michael Ramsey (San Diego) Michael Rappaport (San Diego), Chris Green (Mississippi), Gary Lawson (Boston University), John McGinnis (Northwestern) and Todd Zywicki (George Mason) on an amicus Brief of Originalist Scholars in NLRB v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:33 pm
Ramsey, and an excellent article How to Save Our Courts by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.I commend The Advocate to any Texas civil practitioner. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Amy Howe
  The Cato Institute has filed an amicus brief in support of EPIC, which authors Jim Harper and Randy Barnett discuss at Cato’s blog. [read post]