Search for: "RAYMOND v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2008, 6:05 am
Raymond Flynn, Jun., 1984, pp. 79-81.. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At Fa on First, Wen Fa looks at the record of one of the potential nominees, Judge Raymond Kethledge, on First Amendment issues. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Il commence ainsi un duel judiciaire, dans lequel ce qui compte ne sont pas les faits, mais leur interprétation et lacapacité des deux avocats.Ce sera la justicequi gagnera ou bine l'habileté dans la manipulation des évènements? [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Haagen, Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law--Raymond C. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Education minister Evarist Bartolo has filed libel proceedings against the editor of the Sunday Times of Malta, Raymond Bugeja, and journalist Ivan Camilleri, over an article alleging he had instructed the Foundation for Tomorrow’s Schools to overpay a tiling contracto [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]