Search for: "RICHARD S. BARNES, an individual"
Results 41 - 60
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2018, 8:14 am
In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “Supreme Court seems reluctant to prohibit state and federal prosecutions of same crime. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
The handler’s lack of control over his canine partner stems from a combination of factors. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Cranor, and David Gee published a paper on the litigation use of Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s considerations for evaluating whether an association is causal or not.3See Raymond Richard Neutra, Carl F. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
But what stands out is not so much Judge Kavanaugh’s specific disagreements with the majority. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am
” At Slate, Richard Hasen writes that “[d]ocuments released ahead of Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings this week that date from his time in George W. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm
Wragg argues that there is clearly a degree of public interest in the BBC’s broadcast in Richard. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” For The Washington Post Robert Barnes notes that the case “is one of several in which the Trump administration switched sides; the Obama administration had backed challengers of Ohio’s process. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Mark Walsh for Education Week’s School Law Blog, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Josh Gerstein at Politico, Marcia Coyle and Tony Mauro at Law.com, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Sam Baker at Axios, Jaclyn Belczyk at Jurist, Richard Wolf for USA Today, and Jess Bravin at The Wall Street… [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
” Briefly: For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[c]onservatives are controlling most of the Supreme Court’s closely divided cases so far this term by sticking to the words written by Congress. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes observes that after yesterday’s October-sitting opinion from Justice Neil Gorsuch, “it is most likely that Chief Justice Roberts is writing the opinion for the Court in [partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Richard Re has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses “the myth-puncturing critique of [the late justice Antonin] Scalia’s career that law professor Richard Hasen dishes out in his new book The Justice of Contradictions. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the plaintiff in Tuesday’s second case, Lozman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
But moral rights is more empowering to individual artists. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Bradford Betz for Fox News, Josh Gerstein at Politico, and Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that “[i]t was the second time in four days that the court has sided with the administration against immigration advocates. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the case calls on the justices to “undertake[] a potentially landmark examination of how law enforcement’s use of technology impacts the American notion of privacy. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Jesner v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
Supreme Court, the National Labor Relations Board’s general counsel said he gave a series of inaccurate answers” during the argument that “seemed to undercut his argument that workers must be allowed to press group claims even if they signed agreements to take disputes individually to arbitration. [read post]
