Search for: "ROBERT SMITH, III" Results 1 - 20 of 402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Smith explains in his article here, Heller's common use test cannot be escaped by pointing to technological developments or new trends in crime. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Sidar, written by Judge Toby Heytens and joined by Judges Robert Bruce King and J. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules Public Officials Can Sometimes Be Sued for Blocking Critics on Social Media Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 3/14/2024 A unanimous Supreme Court ruled public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Sidar, written by Judge Toby Heytens and joined by Judges Robert Bruce King and J. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
COMPLETE LIST OF WITNESSES[34] Plaintiff’s witnesses: Mikhail Sazonov Dmitry Rybolovlev Robert Wittman Guy Stair Sainty Yves Bouvier Sotheby’s Corporate Representative Nicholas Acquavella Claudine Godts (Wildenstein Gallery) Sanford Heller Samuel Valette Bill Ruprecht Alexander Bell Bruno Vinciguerra Sotheby’s witnesses: Samuel Valette Bill Ruprecht Alexander Bell Bruno Vinciguerr [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am by Norman L. Eisen
Cir. 2007)) (“The law of our circuit allows a court to assume hypothetical statutory jurisdiction even if we cannot [so] assume Article III jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm by bndmorris
Smith Schlinck, Ok Zoomer: Teaching Legal Research to Gen Z, 115 Law Libr. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
Ovarian Cancer – with distant metastases or inoperable or unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration Paraneoplastic Pemphigus Patau Syndrome (Trisomy 13) Pearson Syndrome Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease-Classic Form Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease-Connatal Form Peripheral Nerve Cancer – metastatic or recurrent Peritoneal Mesothelioma Peritoneal Mucinous Carcinomatosis Perry Syndrome Phelan-McDermid Syndrome Pineoblastoma – Childhood Pleural Mesothelioma Pompe… [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc. (1974), private-figure plaintiffs—as plaintiffs here are likely to be—only have to show negligence to recover proven compensatory damages (including identifiable business losses as well as emotional distress damages). [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
"The judicial Power shall extend to … Cases … [and] to Controversies …" US Constitution, Article III Sec. 2 We all know roughly what that means, right? [read post]