Search for: "ROBERT T. CRAWFORD" Results 81 - 100 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm by Orin Kerr
Furthermore, the source characterizes claims by Crawford’s sources that “the fact that the joint dissent doesn’t mention [sic] Roberts’ majority . . . [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:31 am by Glenn Reynolds
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Robert Crawford emails: “Is it paranoid to notice that the day after Kaus announces he’s going to Newsweak, he tries to start a fight between Beck and Breitbart? [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:17 pm
“Judge Southwick couldn’t name a single one,” she reports. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:48 am by David Oscar Markus
When Crawford asked whether he would nominate a justice like Roberts, now that the chief justice voted to uphold the president’s healthcare law, Romney answered that he “certainly wouldn’t nominate someone who I knew” was going to come out with a decision that I “vehemently disagreed with. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:45 am
But if you haven't (and my students don't), then you can learn many useful things. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Jan Crawford of CBS News -- recently recognized as one of television's sexiest legal commentators, by the way -- doesn't think so. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:12 am by Lovechilde
Clarence and Virginia Thomas After the theory that Chief Justice Roberts' vote to uphold ACA was caused by his epilepsy medication didn't fly, the latest conservative narrative making the rounds (thanks to a "scoop" by CBS's Jan Crawford) is that Roberts switched his vote, buckling to external political pressure, and then withstood a ferocious month-long campaign by Justice Kennedy to bring him back around. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
A few days later, Jan Crawford of CBS News reported that Roberts had originally voted to strike down the mandate before changing his mind. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  But Blakely and Crawford have revolutionized 6th Amendment jurisprudence, and I haven’t seen anything nearly as pernicious out of the Roberts Court as the 1996 decision in Whren v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:05 pm
Don't Tell Me! [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
The present appeal involves only Crawford’s conviction for raping Roberts. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 7:15 am
Note that under Crawford, as under Roberts before it, it is the prosecution, the party seeking admission of the prior statement, that sometimes claims the witness is unavailable. [read post]