Search for: "ROBERT W POWERS"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
” In the George W. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 3:31 pm
One of those attorneys is Robert Rutter of Ohio. [read post]
23 May 2019, 11:09 am
W. [read post]
18 May 2007, 4:34 pm
"Desperate measures are needed when we're in desperate situations," City Council Vice President Robert W. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Items of interest include: Terri Peretti (Department of Political Science, Santa Clara University) reviews IN THE BALANCE: LAW AND POLITICS IN THE ROBERTS COURT (W. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:13 am
“[W]e cannot ignore the disconnect between the decision made and the explanation given,” Roberts wrote as he referenced the sole reason given by the administration: that it complied with a request by the Department of Justice to insert the citizenship question because it was necessary to review compliance with the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 11:15 pm
I did not bother watching George W. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 8:56 am
Maranto, JUDGING BUSH, Stanford University Press, 2009 ROBERT MARANTO, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville - Education ReformRICHARD E. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 5:00 pm
Locke does not postulate a world like Robert Filmer’s, written about in the Patriarcha, in which the patriarchal power is unlimited. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
"Both the Hughes and Roberts courts ruled during periods of economic difficulties and political shifts in power," Hurley adds. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 4:11 pm
Had the world not suffered eight years of George W. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
See W. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:57 am
Kenneth W. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
See W. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:53 am
Click on Robert Hefner’s illustration for the Mr. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 1:53 pm
Robert "Punitive Damages" Bork is among those. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 8:52 am
And he is facile with the news media; Robert Gibbs, Mr. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
First, Roberts invokes the separation of powers and judicial independence. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
I have a somewhat narrow question for the informed readership about one of the arguments in CJ Roberts's opinion in NFIB about the nature of the "exaction" at issue. The Chief says this at p. 43: "[W]e need not here decide the precise point at which an exaction becomes so punitive that the taxing power does not authorize it. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:30 am
Robert Rosen It doesn’t take masses of data or high-powered statistics to generate important results. [read post]
