Search for: "ROCHE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Id. at 25 (citing Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Although the text pretty strongly favors Roche, Stanford and the United States (as amicus) presented a strong policy case for public ownership of publicly funded inventions. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm
United States Affirm Details Fox, v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
The amicus brief filed by the United States, by contrast, addresses the problem more directly. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:45 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
United States, which challenged whether an individual under surveillance has the right to sue when the government has kept documentation of this surveillance. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
Vergeer en Zonen before District Court of The Hague (Class 46) Poland Polish Patent Office partially invalidates VOGUE registration for Advance Magazine Publishers (Class 46) Poland, brands and billboards (Class 46) South America South American cooperation plan in IP rights (IP tango) Spain Spanish Ministry of Employment auctioning brand ‘Galerías Preciados’ (Class 46) Russia Interbrand’s ranking of Russia’s most valuable brands (IP… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
