Search for: "RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 12:42 pm
” [Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 2:12 pm
United States State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
The proposed registry is “another example of [the Trump Administration] trying to extort the State of New York to get information that they can use at the Department of Homeland Security and ICE that they’ll use to deport people,” said New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
Accordingly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit—the decisions of which are binding on the University of California—has expressly recognized that expression "related to [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
United States, Welch v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
The United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) has likewise recognized the de minimis principle, codifying the defense at 29 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
,” citing Utah v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Kansas (No. 18-6135) Argument date 10/7: The question presented is whether the VIII and XIV Amendments permit states to abolish the insanity defense. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
” In Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Fossil, Inc., involving whether willful infringement is a requirement to seek an award of an infringer’s profits in a trademark infringement suit; Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
(relisted after the June 20 conference) Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, 633 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2011); Rodriguez v. [read post]
