Search for: "ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 2:21 am
Here’s the deal:   “Last summer, the Dow Chemical Company won a heated auction for a well-run, highly valued specialty chemical company called Rohm & Haas. . . . [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:20 am
Dow Chemical/Rohm and Haas: Will Dow Chemical and Rohm and Haas spend today distributing deal toys or duking it out? [read post]
The Dow Chemical Case Dow was a shareholder derivative suit filed nearly a year ago amid turmoil over Dow’s planned acquisition of another chemical company, Rohm & Haas, for aggregate consideration of approximately $18.8 billion. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm by Bexis
Rohm & Haas Co., 2010 WL 935650, at *3 (Mich. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 8:45 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
On January 11, 2010, a year after a major corporate battle between the Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) and Rohm & Haas Company (“ROH”) regarding a $19 billion merger, Chancellor Chandler dismissed derivative claims including Caremark-type allegations against Dow’s current directors and officers for failure to adequately plead demand futility under Court of Chancery Rule 23.1. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 2:46 am
If the article you are searching does not appear go to the top of the screen and click on Law.Com Newswire and scroll down to the appropriate article: Chief Justice Described as Fully Recovered in Hospital After Seizure, Fall Judge Finds Tobacco Settlement Bars Claims for Punitive Damages Firm Resolves Dispute in KPMG Tax Probe Ex-Deputy AG McNulty Joins Baker & McKenzie Nike Settles Race Discrimination Lawsuit for $7.6 Million Rohm & Haas Faces… [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:58 pm
The district court granted summary judgment for Rohm and Haas, reasoning that Crosby received all of the life insurance benefits she was due and that the company's conduct did not warrant monetary penalties. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:51 am by Broc Romanek
Continued Oversight Deference to Directors: Delaware Dismisses Derivative Claims Below is analysis of a recent decision from Brad Aronstam of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz: Last week, Chancellor Chandler - in In re Dow Chemical Company Derivative Litigation - dismissed derivative claims that Dow's officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the company in connection with Dow's more than $18 billion acquisition of Rohm & Haas… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:22 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Dow has failed to convince me that the information Wachtell had access to regarding Dow’s strategies and asset values in 2006 and 2007 will substantially advance the interest of Rohm and Haas in this litigation. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:06 am by Maxwell Kennerly
But big chemical companies like Dow and Rohm & Haas don’t admit anything other than the eighty-year-old link to liver cancer. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:16 am
.; Dow Corning Ltd; Dyson Technology Ltd; ExxonMobil Chemical Ltd; Ford of Europe; Fujitsu Services Ltd; G E Healthcare; GKN plc; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Hewlett-Packard Ltd; IBM UK Ltd; Infineum UK Ltd; Kodak Ltd; Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd; Microsoft Ltd; Nestle UK Ltd; Nokia UK Ltd; NXP Semiconductors UK Limited; Pfizer Ltd; Philips Electronics UK Ltd; Pilkington Group Ltd; Procter & Gamble Ltd; QinetiQ Ltd; Renishaw plc; Rohm and Haas (UK) Ltd; Rolls-Royce plc; Shell… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Katharine Jensen
  Specifically, plaintiffs’ complaint alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the defendants by 1) approving a strategic merger with Rohm & Haas Company (“R & H”), 2) misrepresenting the relationship between the R & H transaction and another transaction with Kuwait’s Petrochemicals Industries Company ("Kuwait"), 3) failing to notice and avoid alleged bribery in connection with Dow’s merger with Kuwait,… [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:49 am
" -- Mark Adler, Chief IP Counsel, Rohm and Haas Company"The process of quality examination begins with the applicant. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Moose, who also serves as a director of Rohm and Haas Company, The AES Corporation, Natixis Advisor Funds, and Loomis Sayles Funds. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 1:05 am
Companies and How Should the Embassy Respond? [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm by WIMS
., 292 F.3d at 260 (finding defendant failed to prove its own share of the harm); Rohm & Haas Co., 2 F.3d at 1280 (same)." [read post]