Search for: "ROWE v. MAINE STATE PRISON" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 2:43 am by Melina Padron
BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) Court of Appeal: Control order against terrorist suspect was flawed. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:09 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the main opinion in Carey v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
Humphreys v Revenue and Customs [2012] UKSC 18 Supreme Court: paying child tax credit to “main” care giver not discriminatory (under art.14 ECHR) to father who was caring for the child 3 days per week. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
Clark's April 27th execution date because there was sufficient evidence that the State of Texas may have misapplied Atkins v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
”The main issue raised by Skinner that may have captured the Court’s attention is whether a state inmate seeking access to DNA testing of evidence may raise that claim in a Section 1983 civil rights action instead of a federal habeas petition.In Skinner’s petition for review, Owen told the justices that seven of nine federal courts of appeals have approved of the civil rights vehicle. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am by Adam Wagner
But a skirmish This bail hearing was in fact only a skirmish in preparation for the main event. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
Bell (07-1114), seeking a ruling that a state prison inmate who has raised constitutional challenges twice before in state courts may not press them anew in a federal habeas case. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm by Jon Sands
United States, No. 11-99003 (Silverman with Wardlaw; partial dissent by Reinhardt)--- A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a § 2255 post-conviction motion filed by a federal death-row prisoner, holding that defense counsels' guilt- and penalty-phase strategies were the product of professionally reasonable investigations under Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Graeme Hall
The Attorney General, in a speech to Lincoln’s Inn, has stated his intent to limit the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights by intervening before the Grand Chamber in Scoppola v Italy (no. 3); another case concerning prisoners’ voting rights. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
The main reason is that more states -- notably including Texas, which leads the nation in executions -- have provided life imprisonment without the possibility of parole as an alternative. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
The opinion also states that it is improper for a judge to utilize such research to corroborate or disprove adjudicative facts. [read post]