Search for: "RPC Inc"
Results 61 - 80
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2022, 6:12 am
” Finally, interesting news on a law firm CEO conflict for the Ince Group plc (Stock Ticker: INCE), which describes itself: “As well as providing legal services, The Ince Group provides accounting, financial services, consulting and pensions advice to clients. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am
He is incapable of scintilla of invention (Technip France SA’s Patent [2004] RPC 46). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
That was the opening sentence of Mr Justice Arnold's judgment in Interflora, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 12:10 pm
Century Steps, Inc., 850 F.2d 675, 679, 7 USPQ2d 1315, 1319 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:11 am
[RPC 1.5(a).] [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:50 am
In undoubtedly one of the most important decisions of the year so far, on 24 August 2021, the English Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in FibroGen v Akebia (FibroGen Inc v Akebia Therapeutics Inc [2021] EWCA Civ 1279), partially allowing FibroGen’s appeal, and so finding one of the ‘Family A’ patents, EP 823, valid and infringed. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
He also cited Hallen Co v Brabantia (UK) Ltd [1991] RPC 195 and Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd [2002] RPC 22, both in relation to the relevance of commercial considerations to obviousness. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:16 am
In Optrics Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:16 am
In Optrics Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:16 am
In Optrics Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
RPC 1.14(b) presents an exception to that rule; it permits a lawyer who “reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial . . . financial . . . harm unless action is taken and cannot adequately act in the client’s own interest” to “take reasonably necessary protective action, including . . . , in appropriate cases, seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:07 pm
Baranello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:11 am
” “The firm of Nagel Rice, which represents Escobar in the malpractice suit, moved to disqualify Mazie Slater, claiming that the firm’s representation by Wilentz constituted a violation of New Jersey’s RPC 1.12. [read post]
Is There a Conflict of Interest When a CD Defense Attorney Becomes Coverage Counsel Post-Litigation?
19 Aug 2011, 4:40 pm
Net, Inc., 945 F. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
[See Windsurfing Inc v Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd [1985] RPC 59 at page 73 (per Lord Justice Oliver): "There are, we think, four steps which require to be taken in answering the jury question. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) reports on a recent decision of Mr Justice Birss in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 on the issue. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm
It is not correct to say that the purpose of the Copyright Act is to protect original skill and labour (see Navitaire Inc v Easyjet Airline Company Limited [2006] RPC 111 at 148-149). 22. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:46 pm
Access more information on the Science Advisory Board hydraulic fracturing review committee and the supporting documents (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 1:32 pm
Loving Care Agency, Inc. adds to this area. [read post]
