Search for: "RPC Inc"
Results 121 - 140
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
Houlihan licensed the trade mark to Grape Links Inc that traded as Barefoot Cellars.Grape Links Inc was sold to Gallo by an agreement dated 10 November 2004. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:07 pm
Baranello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 1:32 pm
Loving Care Agency, Inc. adds to this area. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
Loving Care Agency Inc., et al., — A.2d —-, —N.J. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 99 N.J. 284, 290-92 (1985); Pierce v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:19 am
Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc., 300 N.J. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:11 am
[RPC 1.5(a).] [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
RPC Properties, Inc., Ct. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1299 [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:39 am
Johnson & Johnson Inc. and Cordis Corp. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:21 am
Even though the court's judgment did not modify or expand on the law, having applied established common law principles laid down in Trek Technology (S) Pte Ltd v FE Global Electronics Pte Ltd (No. 2) [2005] 3 SLR 389 for novelty and Windsurfing International Inc v Tabur Marine [1985] RPC 59 as approved by the Court of Appeal in First Currency Choice Pte Ltd v Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd [2008] 1 SLR 335 for inventiveness, the following lessons may still be learnt from… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Tile, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
Primerica Holdings, Inc., 822 F. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm
It is not correct to say that the purpose of the Copyright Act is to protect original skill and labour (see Navitaire Inc v Easyjet Airline Company Limited [2006] RPC 111 at 148-149). 22. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:43 am
Marlayne, Inc., 83 N.J. 460, 477 (1980)). [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:38 am
UBS PaineWebber Inc. et al. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:52 am
He is a simple Kat who has never felt that a complex test is needed and he mourns the passage of Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 -- a decision that seems to be floating in a sort of precedental limbo, no longer authoritative but still worthy enough to cite. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:32 am
There is no unitary European supplementary protection certificate, but national ones only.According to Burrows,In [in Re Gilead Sciences, Inc.] an application was made for an SPC in respect of EP (UK) 0 915 894 and the combination of two antiretroviral compounds, namely tenofovir disoproxil and emtricitabine. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:59 am
STATE DECISIONS:
Czar Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:58 am
(BL O/043/07) 8 February 2007Canon KK (BL O/045/07) 12 February 2007Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. [read post]
