Search for: "RPM, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2013, 8:31 am
However, these companies - Bondex International Inc., RPM International Inc. and Specialty Products Holding Corp. - are attempting to raise doubts about whether the compound they used, called Chrysotile asbestos, is as harmful as regular asbestos. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:19 pm
In the last Supreme Court term, a 5-4 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
PSKS, Inc., presumably the Court will do the same for minimum RPM. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
Apple, Inc. applied to register the mark ITUNES LP for computer software, telecommunications services, entertainment services, and software design and development services relating to, inter alia, audio and multimedia content. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:58 pm by Jeffrey May
PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877, 2007-1 Trade Cases ¶75,753, RPM agreements are to be judged under the rule of reason. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm by John W. Arden
PSKS, Inc. (2007-1 Trade Cases ¶75,753), that RPM should be held to a rule of reason standard rather than declared per se illegal under federal antitrust law. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:53 am
PSKS, Inc., the FTC recently agreed to modify its March 2000 Consent Order against Nine West Group Inc. and allow the footwear company to engage in resale price maintenance with its dealers. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am by Dennis Crouch
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, et al., No. 20-414; RPM International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:35 am by Josh Wright
  The WSJ describes the recent iteration of the conflict: To build its early lead in e-books, Amazon Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:05 pm by Josh Wright
According to this WSJ story, the plaintiffs appear to be ready to petition for certiorari not in order to encourage the Court to revisit its earlier decision, but on the grounds that the Fifth Circuit ruling closes the door to all challenges to RPM schemes under the rule of reason: Supreme Court losers like Kay’s Kloset—which went out of business after lower courts dismissed its claim against the Brighton Inc. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
" In the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]