Search for: "Radics v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The decision in the House of Lords in Austin v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis, finding that ‘kettling’ peaceful protesters and bystanders for 7 hours did not create a deprivation of liberty, has been heavily criticised; it was expected that the ECtHR would take a different stance. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” However, as reported in Press Gazette, Hacked Off said that “after 15 months of IPSO claiming that radical changes to make it more effective and more independent of the industry are being secured urgently, these minor changes are a damp-squib. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
They could frustrate government responses to social problems in a way not seen in America since the Great Depression. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
In what has become a ritualized performance over the years, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights delivered his statement for the opening of the 32nd session of the U.N. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
We will expose this dangerous movement, protect our nation’s children from this radical assault, and preserve our beloved American way of life. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
The report was quickly followed by a series of proposals for radical change in the antitrust laws, aligning with the themes sounded during the House hearings and set forth in the majority-staff report. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Unlike recent years, when masks and social distancing were common, if not the explicit rule, in many states hardly anyone would know the country was entering the third year of a pandemic. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Former FCC Commissioner Glen Robinson has argued that the public interest standard “is vague to the point of vacuousness, providing neither guidance nor constraint on the agency’s action. [read post]