Search for: "Randy Hudson" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2010, 7:07 am by Rick Hills
I suspect that the real unwritten basis for Judge Hudson's opinion (and Randy Barnett's legal theory on which it is based) is the notion that, when the feds impose paternalistic or otherwise especially intrusive burdens, then their impositions ought to be reviewed with especially suspicious scrutiny under the doctrine of enumerated powers. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:07 am by Randy Barnett
Judge Hudson’s opinion, while not a ruling on the merits, was an express ruling on the seriousness of the challenge. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
The LLC, owned by Amy Schwartz and Randy Schwartz, had no operating agreement. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:41 am by PaulKostro
NOTE: My legal and mediation services are offered to clients in Union, Middlesex, Somerset, Essex, Hudson, Bergen, and Morris counties in NJ. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:08 pm by Howard Wasserman
This was the rationale Judge Hudson adopted in striking down the individual mandate in the Virginia case. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Because I leave for my lecture in less than an hour, I cannot do full blog post on the decision. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:50 pm by Ilya Somin
It includes contributions by co-blogger Randy Barnett and myself. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:35 am
H.B. 511, sponsored by Matt Hudson, R-Naples, already passed through Florida's House Insurance and Banking Subcommittee in December, which law would limit doctor dispensing charges. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:30 am
Randy Deanda, Olagues suffered major head trauma and was reported to have died at scene. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:33 am by Randy Barnett
Without a doubt, it would be much better for the challengers that either Judge Hudson or Judge Vinson find the mandate to be unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
(A-5945-07T2; Decided July 13, 2009): Picture by Randy Son Of Robert N.J.S.A. 54A:5-1(n) provides that a taxpayer must pay income tax on “alimony and separate maintenance payments to the extent that such payments are required to be made under a decree of divorce or separate maintenance but not including payments for support of minor children. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:45 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Hudson Oaks insurance attorneys need to be able to distinguish between real insurance claims and fraud claims. [read post]