Search for: "Read v. Social Security Administration"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 11:39 am
Lindke v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
The red-teaming and reporting requirements are scoped to models that present a “serious risk” to security and related topics and that also meet certain technical requirements outlined in Section 4.2(b)(i) of the EO. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
The mother’s application for an injunction to restrain the vaccination was accordingly dismissed, for several reasons [23]: she had not produced “cogent, objective medical and/or welfare evidence demonstrating a genuine contra-indication to the administration of one or all of the routine vaccinations” [24]; in the absence of cogent, objective evidence of harm to WSP’s welfare, her objections on religious grounds did not otherwise outweigh the child’s welfare… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
A Texas District Court recently issued an opinion, in Utah v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
Read More » Tags: Administrative Procedures Act, Chevron Deference, Major Questions Doctrine [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Read the full report here. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
They remains suspicious of unguided autonomous decision making and directionless markets as the 1974 version, but the appeal is to a broader audience, and the invocation is to the promise of state based quality control measures in the form of increasingly complex webs of administrative discretion. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
When the Social Security Administration finds him entirely disabled, he goes back to the NFL and gets his benefit increased to a higher tier, but not the highest tier. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Clean Up The Internet’s commentary can be read here. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
The Office emphasized that this change is needed in light of the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:59 am
FBI agents query Section 702 databases in virtually every national security investigation. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Case Study: The SEC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 3:28 pm
District Court Judge in Missouri v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am
The offence of abandoning a child is found in Part V of the Criminal Code. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
The fact is that the number of securities suit filings fluctuates. [read post]
