Search for: "Read v. Social Security Administration" Results 141 - 160 of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
  School administrators charged him with cyberbullying. [read post]
13 May 2007, 9:46 pm
  Does the Social Security Administration help out by reminding of this legal hurdle, perhaps under its FAQ? [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Ezra Rosser
When the Social Security Administration stopped making Supplemental Security Income payments to 5-year-old Brian Zebley, despite his continuing and severe disabilities, lawyers at the legal aid organization Community Legal Services filed a class action. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:44 am by Matt Kaiser
Alito Jr., Samuel Alito, SCOTUS, Social Security, Social Security Administration, Supreme Court, Taniguchi v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Rosalind English
The Child Poverty Action Group (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions(Appellant) [2010] UKSC 54 – Read judgment / press release The Supreme Court has ruled that where benefits are overpaid as a result of a mistaken calculation, the department responsible cannot claim these amounts back via the common law route of restitution; the Secretary of State’s only recourse is via Section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-4096 November 10, 2011 Judge: Ebel Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Richardson appealed a district court's order that affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Childhood Disability Benefits. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Likewise, the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration is an inferior officer. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that time spent by construction workers going through security screening on their way to the work site inside an airport was not compensable under the FLSA in large part because the screening was required by the Federal Aviation Administration, and the employer “did not primarily — or even particularly — benefit from the [FAA-required] security regime. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am by Dave
However, social security legislation does not generally permit this type of negotiated compromise. [read post]