Search for: "Read v. Social Security Administration"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am
However, social security legislation does not generally permit this type of negotiated compromise. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
Azar opinion may be read here. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am
In reality, on February 12, 2014, the Obama Administration, through the National Institute of Standards (NIST), announced the NIST Cyber Security Framework to “allow organizations – regardless of size, degree of cyber risk or cybersecurity sophistication – to apply the principles and best practices of risk management to improve the security and resilience of critical infrastructure. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
The red-teaming and reporting requirements are scoped to models that present a “serious risk” to security and related topics and that also meet certain technical requirements outlined in Section 4.2(b)(i) of the EO. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 12:53 pm
Section 1115 of the Social Security Act requires the “periodic evaluation” of approved demonstrations. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 7:46 am
The Social Security Administration concurred, and awarded LaVertu disability benefits under the Social Security Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:48 am
Continue reading [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:42 am
Social Security Administration for survivorship benefits. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:09 pm
In addition to finding that the plaintiffs in Ramos v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
H.R. 8954 - To amend part B of title IV of the Social Security Act to require States to comply with Federal standards established under the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
For if [Social Security Board v.] [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:11 pm
As far as the plaintiffs allege, Russia’s goal was to assist the Trump campaign, not dump the social security numbers and emails of DNC employees and donors. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
The Social Security Administration didn't like this ruling, but it acquiesced to it -- albeit in the Ninth Circuit only.Meanwhile, in California, another tragedy was taking place. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:29 am
Read more here. -- Cyra Akila Choudhury [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
But the absurdity of different aspects of the decision in Missouri v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:00 am
FTC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
15 Administrability: Information asymmetries between enforcers and market participants can be especially stark in the digital economy. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:28 am
The Social Security Administration interprets the Social Security Act to allow children conceived after their father’s death to qualify for Social Security survivors benefits only if they could inherit from their father under state intestacy law. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Mynar v. [read post]
