Search for: "Reebok International, LTD"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 5:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld a district court's summary judgment in favor of the NFL and its separately owned teams on the ground that they function as a "single entity" when licensing and marketing their logos and trademarks under an exclusive licensing agreement with Reebok International Ltd. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:44 am
In September 2011, Reebok International, Ltd. agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it falsely claimed that its toning shoes strengthened muscles. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Defendant: Nike, Inc., Reebok International, LTD, adidas-Salomon North America, Inc., New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:27 pm
International standards were not a priority. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
But, in 2001, it was shut out, when the NFL’s 32 teams decided to solicit bids for an exclusive license to use those marks on headgear, and Reebok International Ltd., won the bidding contest, and got an exclusive license. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:41 pm
Background As previously reported in this blog, the case arose in 2001 when NFL Properties (“NFLP”), a joint venture created in 1963 to develop, license, and market the intellectual property owned by the NFL’s member teams, granted one of American Needle’s competitors (Reebok International Ltd.) an exclusive license to manufacture headwear bearing all the teams’ logos and trademarks. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
[6] Instead, NFL Properties granted an exclusive headwear license to Reebok International, Ltd. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
Target Corporation – Grand Image, Ltd. [read post]
