Search for: "Refuse Materials, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 3,475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2009, 10:45 pm
The TTAB affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark CHROMALOY, finding it merely descriptive of "surgical implants comprising artificial material. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 3:29 am
September 4, 2019 - 11 AM: In re Kahiki Foods, Inc., Serial No. 87648828 [Refusal to register the mark BOWL & STIX (in standard character form) for "Oriental and Pacific rim cuisine prepared foods . . . [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
The Board reversed two Section 2(e)(1) refusals to register the mark IPHARMACIST, finding it not merely descriptive of training videos concerning use of personal digital assistants preprogrammed with pharmacy-related information, custom design of software for such PDAs, and printed materials containing such information. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:30 am
Nature's Youth, Inc. sought to register the mark NY for "cosmetics, face creams, lotions for cosmetic purposes," but the PTO refused registration under Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 3:39 am
In re Hana Financial Group Inc., Serial No. 86019890 (June 2, 2021) [not precedential (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:56 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In light of these EEOC CHOA and other enforcement actions, employers should proceed carefully before refusing accommodation. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Securities and Exchange Command#39;n, 297 F.2d 112, 115 (2d Cir.1961)(failure to disclose information lack of basis is an omission of a material fact). [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
Miracle Star also refused to make available all program records pertaining to the COLA contract. 6. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:36 am
Because a genuine issue of material fact existed in the EEOC's lawsuit, the federal court refused to grant summary judgment to Weight Watchers and ordered the case to proceed to trial. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
[Appeal briefs and other papers may be found via PACER; Oral argument recordings may be found here].Ex parte appeals:In re Vibrynt, Inc., Appeal No. 13-1019 (Serial No. 77701760) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark PREVAIL for "medical devices, namely, abdominal implants and delivery systems therefor," in view of the registered mark PEEK PREVAIL for "surgical implants comprising artificial material]. [read post]