Search for: "Reyna v. United States District Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2018, 8:41 am
On appeal, the Federal Circuit first rejected the district court analysis — holding that “the district court has subject mater jurisdiction” over Mr. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Last December, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a first Office action tentatively rejecting all claims of the "Steve Jobs patent", U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:13 pm
The bottom line in Ivera v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 12:09 pm
He cited the Supreme Court’s holding in Pfaff v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:39 am
CLS Bank International v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
” Id. at *10.View #2: Modify CyborThe second approach, favored by some amici curiae including the United States, may be viewed as a fusion or hybrid of de novo review and deferential review. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
The only judge in the world who has held so far that Apple deserved a patent on that concept is Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The decision was authored by Judge Reyna and joined by Judge Hughes. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:46 pm
Aktiebolag v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
Judge Reyna wrote in dissent. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm
Related posts: Bio/Pharma Amici Brief Filed in Marine Polymer Reexam AppealOn September 26, 2011, the a three-judge-panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
Cir. 2013) [4] United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
(collectively, “CLS”) by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia holding that certain claims of Alice’s U.S. [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:59 pm
Using its de novo power, the appellate court rejected the district court’s offer’s interpretation and found that it constituted an offer for sale. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
United States, 511 F.3d 1365, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:54 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted summary judgment that: (1) OWW was collaterally estopped from challenging the invalidity of claims 1, 2, 4, 15, 16, and 20 of the ’237 patent; (2) claims 18, 19, 21, 22, and 23 of the ’237 patent were invalid for obviousness; and (3) Alps failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to inequitable conduct. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
Motiva subsequently filed a complaint with the ITC alleging infringement based on Nintendo’s importation of the Wii system into the United States in violation of Section 337. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Ex Parte Schmieding (12:01 Tuesday) A new model for patent and trademark depository libraries (Director’s Forum) Patent backlog hinders nation’s job creation (PatentlyBIOtech) US patent counts, 2010 (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) 2011 patent reexamination filings continue uptrend (Patents Post-Grant) Avoiding a stay pending patent reexamination: Osmose v Arch Chemicals; Richtek v uPI Semiconductor (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District… [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
Samsung II trial in the Northern District of California. [read post]
