Search for: "Richard Gill "
Results 61 - 80
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Richard Hasen suggests that “[d]eciding Gill and Benisek together would allow the court, in announcing a new partisan-gerrymandering rule, to say that sometimes the rule favors one party and sometimes it favors the other. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
” Commentary on the grant in Benisek comes from Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who notes “several differences” between Benisek and the court’s other pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The keynote address was delivered by Sir Richard Arnold, who addressed the requirement for a trade mark applicant to have ‘intention to use’ and its current status in EU and UK law. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg suggests that “[c]ataloging some of the instances where courts incorporate math helps illuminate how the Court should proceed in Gill v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
Sarah Grant summarized Stephen Gill’s tort claims against the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 10:13 am
Richard Betts and Matthew Waxman outlined a proposal for constraining the president’s authority to launch a first-use nuclear attack. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” At The Hill, Jacqueline Thomsen reports that “[a] top sociology group fired back at Supreme Court Justice John Roberts for referring to sociology as “’gobbledygook’” during the oral argument last week in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Christopher Elmendorf and Eric McGhee respond to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s complaint at last week’s oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At RealClear Politics, Matt Walter weighs in on Gill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
On Tuesday, the justices heard oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:01 am
“The justices tackle partisan gerrymandering again: In Plain English” [Amy Howe, SCOTUSBlog, earlier on Gill v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr notes that the Supreme Court’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “extraordinary developments in Wisconsin,” where partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am
” Slate’s Amicus podcast features a discussion of Gill v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:10 pm
It will consist of two panel sessions composed of leading IP practitioners and academics who regularly contribute to JIPLP and GRUR Int, and feature a keynote address by Sir Richard Arnold.Here's the programme:14:00-14:30 - Registration14:30-14:40 - Welcome remarks14:40-15:40 - EU trade mark law (Moderator: Eleonora Rosati (University of Southampton and JIPLP Co-Editor); Discussants: Yann Basire (Université de Haute Alsace and CEIPI - Université de… [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:54 pm
The Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments in Gill v. [read post]
