Search for: "Richard G Garcia"
Results 41 - 47
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
§ 453(g)(1) (hereinafter “Salmonella Petition” or “Petition”). [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:55 am
— Carlos Gámez (@chgamez) November 10, 2019 Check out the offerings of the @ABAesq Law Pracitce Division or just check out Law Technology Today! [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:04 am
Nadine Garcia, the executive vice president of Trust for America's Health; Christopher Neuwirth, the assistant commissioner for public health infrastructure, laboratories and emergency preparedness in the New Jersey Department of Public Health; and Thomas Dobbs, a state health officer in the Mississippi State Department of Health. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
