Search for: "Richard Pildes"
Results 121 - 140
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
Cox for Medium, Brady Zadrozny for The Daily Beast, Rick Pildes for Balkinization, Corey Brettschneider for The New York Times, Paul Kane for The Washington Post, Paul Callan of CNN, Emily Crockett of Vox, as well as Sean Illing, Steven Ertelt of LifeNews, and Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
Pildes, one of the nation's leading voting rights scholars. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
And at Balkinization, Rick Pildes warns that “when Presidents take on the Court, even in the mild form of criticizing the Court’s decisions, Presidents walk a delicate line. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
This measure could supplement Richard Pildes’ proposal that Congress codify the Justice Department’s special counsel regulations. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The following contribution to our VRA symposium comes from Richard L. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
[2] Richard L. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:50 am
"--Richard H. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
, PrawfsBlawg, Aug. 14, 2011, by Rick Hills Why John Edwards Probably Did Not Commit A Crime, Regardless of His Motives or Those of The Donors, Election Law Blog, June 4, 2011, by Richard Pildes Legal Theory Lexicon: Legal Theory, Jurisprudence, and the Philosophy of Law, Legal Theory Blog, Apr. 24, 2011, by Lawrence B. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 4:40 pm
The Neglected Value of Effective Government by Richard H. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
Volume 125 · April 2012 · Number 6 ARTICLE Inventing the “Traditional Concept” of Sex Discrimination Cary Franklin BOOK REVIEWS Law and the President Richard H. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
Pildes The “Principal†Reason Why the PCAOB Is Unconstitutional by Gary Lawson Remove Morrison v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes analyzes the “Purcell” doctrine in election litigation, writing that the doctrine is “not a principle of substantive, federal constitutional law,” which means that “it does not apply to state courts addressing election-law claim. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:35 am
Lamone, with election-law expert Richard Pildes. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm
Gary Corn (US Army JAG corps), Deputy Associate General Counsel David Delaney (DHS), Professor Peter Raven-Hansen, and Professor Ed Richards. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
This blog’s symposium on the Voting Rights Act continues with contributions from Joshua Thompson, Richard Pildes, and Abigail Thernstrom. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
Liptak quotes lawprof Richard Pildes:"It's deeply dangerous for Congress to change the ground rules for individual races based on a judgment about what's fair. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 8:06 am
Richard Pildes argued that COVID-19 could generate an enormous shift toward voting by mail in the 2020 general election—magnifying the possibility of election meltdown if the apparent “winner” on election night turns out to have lost a week or more later. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes notes that “several Justices raised questions about whether partisan-gerrymandering challenges implicitly appeal in one way or another to a baseline of proportional representation (PR),” but Pildes points out that “political scientists have long understood that a system of single-member districting, such as we use for Congress, should not be expected to produce PR. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
— Richard M. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal; commentary on the issues involved in the case comes from Rick Pildes at Balkinization. [read post]
