Search for: "Richard v. Res Care, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
”). 4 See, e.g., Richard Doll & Richard Peto, The Causes of Cancer 1219 (1981) (“when relative risk lies between 1 and 2 … problems of interpretation may become acute, and it may be extremely difficult to disentangle the various contributions of biased information, confounding of two or more factors, and cause and effect. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
”[4] Importantly, the authors of the statistics chapter named names; that is, they cited some cases that butchered the concept of the confidence interval.[5] The fourth edition will have a more difficult job because, despite the care taken in the statistics chapter, many more decisions have misstated or misrepresented the meaning of a confidence interval.[6] Citing more cases perhaps will disabuse federal judges of their reliance upon case law for the meaning of statistical concepts. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:30 am by Jim Walker
Supreme Court in Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Energy Safety Servs., Inc., No. 08-1013ADA - Whether driving is a major life activityo SCOTUS docket hereOakley v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
AmClyde, 511 U.S. 202 (1994), and Boca Grande Club, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
  Richard Doll & Julian Peto, Asbestos: Effects on health of exposure to asbestos 8 (1985) (“In particular, there are no grounds for believing that gastrointestinal cancers in general are peculiarly likely to be caused by asbestos exposure. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am by Jeffrey Vicq
The Board seemingly took another troubling step in this direction in a subsequent decision— FreemantleMedia North America Inc. v Wright Alternative Advertising Inc. (2009 77 C.P.R. (4th) 311). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
The Second Circuit invalidates the FCC’s indecency policy in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]