Search for: "Richardson v. Universal American" Results 41 - 60 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
   The “label” doctrine is supported by the practice of pharmaceutical regulations in Japan as drugs must be used for the use designated in the package insert to be covered by national insurance.Lastly John Pegram (Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York) addressed the American view on Plausibility, first explaining that there are no second medical use claims in the US, because method of treatment claims are allowed. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 2 November 2015 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of Richardson v Facebook and Richardson v Google UK Ltd ([2015] EWHC 3154 (QB)). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, The Religious Convictions of an American Citizen (1916) William H. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Megan Richardson, University of Melbourne – Law School, Barbara McDonald, The University of Sydney Law School, Normann Witzleb, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Monash University – Faculty of Law, David Vaile, University of New South Wales (UNSW) – Faculty of Law; Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre, Graham Greenleaf, University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:15 am by Sean Minahan
  Jesse Richardson Jr., an attorney and professor in the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning at Virginia Tech University and a board member for the American Agricultural Law Association stated ”overall, I think the decision is positive for farmers. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States A Derry priest has been granted permission to sue an American Catholic Diocese for defamation. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
The average American eats about 100 pounds of chicken each year. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
    In other news… United States In a speech at Australian National University, U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
American Red Cross Blood Services, 745 N.E.2d 462, 465 (Ohio App. 2000) (“following the regulations, dictated by the FDA” could not constitute “outrageous” conduct); Haughton v. [read post]