Search for: "Robert D. Peterson"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 2:13 pm
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
This note provides some suggestions for lawyers taking family law cases to arbitration, offered from my perspective as a family law arbitrator. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
It’d be a shame if something happened to her mom” (60 Minutes; CBS). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Laws, ch. 140, § 131(d) (2020). 2124. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:18 pm
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) as well as an address from Bulgarian Minister of Justice H.E. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
Pix Credit hereI wanted to take this opportunity to circulate a discussion draft of an essay, entitled "Legal Semiotics, Globalization and Governance. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Peterson, Daggers & Fighting Knives of the Western World 60 (1968). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Roberts v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994) (stating broadly that “[i]t is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence,” including when “any constitutional violation has been committed by a law enforcement official”); Peterson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Ursano, Robert J. and Matthew J. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
["[T]he Fourth Amendment applies equally whether the government official is a police officer conducting a criminal investigation or a caseworker conducting a civil child welfare investigation. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:00 pm
[12] Id. at *14, citing Peterson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Roberts v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Robert D. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Robert D. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
As Todd David Peterson has written, the “contention that there are historical precedents for the use of Congress’s inherent contempt power against officials who assert the President’s claim of executive privilege is incorrect. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
