Search for: "Robert Ginsburg"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
In short, the Roberts Court has acted lawlessly from the beginning.1. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:21 am
Signatories include Vince Blasi, Kimberle Crenshaw, Jane Ginsburg, Michael Graetz, Ronald Mann, David Pozen, Carol Sanger, Robert and Elizabeth Scott, and others. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
Capitol Attack reflect a larger erosion of democratic norms and setbacks to liberal constitutionalism across western countries, as Aziz Huq, Tom Ginsburg, and Mila Versteeg have observed. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
Tom Ginsburg, A Constitutional Perspective on Institutional Neutrality, in Revisiting The Kalven Report: The University’s Role In Social And Political Action (Keith E. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:40 am
In addition, Justices Ginsburg, Kennedy, Scalia, and Chief Justice Roberts have taught full-time classes in the NELB summer program. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
"Although the Rehnquist and early Roberts Courts issued some important liberal decisions, those days are over. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
Robert Percival, the papers of Justice Blackmun show that in conference the seven justices who took part in the argument were closely divided. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Use expressio unis to get at the fact that the noncommercial use holding is limited to situations where the challenged use is “used as a mark for a commercial product”; the term noncommercial use can reasonably include uses as a mark for political speech—Robert Kennedy, Jr., is using his father’s famous name to promote himself politically (also highlighting the importance of small differences when it comes to speech in the political realm). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
But Justice Ginsburg died on September 18. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Yet, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg observed in dissent in a 2008 case, the paralytic poses a serious risk to the person being executed, because it can mask the fact that the sedative dose was insufficient to induce unconsciousness. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:50 am
For instance, if one queried, “Why did Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissent in Obergefell? [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:14 pm
Hansen IP Institute at Fordham Law School), the panel features (in alphabetical order):Robert Arcamona, Director and Associate General Counsel, IP (Meta)Jane C Ginsburg, Morton L. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
”Expert Statement Kellie Carter Jackson (Michael and Denise Kellen ‘68 Associate Professor of Africana Studies, Wellesley College) “Understanding the Historical Context for White Supremacist Violence in America in Tandem with the Events of January 6, 2021”Expert Statement Chicago Project on Security & Threats*Robert Pape (Director, Chicago Project on Security and Threats), Keven Ruby (Senior Research Director, Chicago Project on Security and Threats) and Kyle… [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Then-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously omitted the customary word “respectfully” before the phrase “I dissent” at the end of her opinion. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:58 pm
First, the Dobbs petition was filed before Justice Ginsburg's death–indeed, it was filed a five days before June Medical was decided. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Days after Justice Ginsburg's death, Mr. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
In that way, he bore a strong resemblance to Marty Ginsburg, the husband of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who in 1993 joined O’Connor on the court as the second female justice. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
Ryan Vacca and Ann Bartow, eds., The Jurisprudential Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (2023). 17. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am
Justice Clarence Thomas presumably knew what he would be getting by assigning the majority opinion to Justice Alito.As Chief Justice John Roberts explained in his concurrence in the judgment, there were other ways for Mississippi to have won this case. [read post]
