Search for: "Robert Koppel" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
Finally, in the Wall Street Journal, Nathan Koppel reports on the impact of last Term’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am by Nabiha Syed
” Jost on Justice reviews the impact of the Roberts Court on business. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:16 am by James Bickford
At ACSblog, Kathrine Jack and Robert Miller consider the implications of Citizens United for abortion opponents’ efforts to establish fetal personhood. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
Also at the WSJ Law Blog, Nathan Koppel reports that “the Fifth Circuit will [today] consider the legality of a race-conscious admissions system at the University of Texas in Austin. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:34 pm by Erin Miller
Nathan Koppel at the WSJ Law Blog summarizes last week’s ABA Journal article on the “flexible standards” established by the Court for patent cases in Bilski v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:09 am by James Bickford
  Manu Raju of  Politico, Nathan Koppel of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, and Tony Mauro of the Blog of Legal Times all have coverage. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
The Wall Street Journal Law Blog’s Nathan Koppel reports that Kagan distanced herself from the article during yesterday’s hearings. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm
" Nathan Koppel of The Wall Street Journal has a news update headlined "High Court Rules in Favor of Gun Rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 am by Ashby Jones
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the court, expressly mentioned that the board can keep functioning, however. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
” The WSJ Law Blog’s Nathan Koppel also has coverage of recent attacks on Kagan by conservatives, including the remarks of former Solicitor General Robert Bork. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm by Anna Christensen
  David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, the Washington Post’s Robert Barnes, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall of the Wall Street Journal, the WSJ Law Blog’s Nathan Koppel, and the AmLaw Daily’s Zach Lowe all report on the “honest services” rulings, as do the Associated Press, the Dallas Morning News, JURIST, Crime and Consequences, and Courthouse News Service (in two… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
  Nathan Koppel of the WSJ Law Blog reports on the eventual resolution of the military recruiting controversy at the law school. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm by Anna Christensen
  The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes, the WSJ Law Blog’s Nathan Koppel, ACSBlog, and the NRO Bench Memos column all recap the opinions handed down this morning in City of Ontario v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
” wonders Nathan Koppel at the WSJ Law Blog. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am by James Bickford
”  Nathan Koppel of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports on a speech that Kagan gave to Princeton alumni in 2003, in which she argued that the Court should defer to Congress when it acts to enforce the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:57 am
" Nathan Koppel and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal report that "Kagan Criticized the Warren Court in Thesis. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:07 am by Erin Miller
In the Washington Post, Roberts Barnes warns commentators from reading too much into Kagan’s service as Solicitor General over the past year, since “The job of solicitor general is to be not a legal philosopher but a lawyer with a client to defend: the United States government. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
At the Los Angeles Times, David Savage observes that the case was the first separation-of-church-and-state case to come before the Court since the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:04 am by Ashby Jones
Folks are positively buzzing, it seems, about this ruling made on Tuesday by Manhattan federal judge Robert Sweet, in which he struck down several patents on human genes. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:01 am by Ashby Jones
Late last year, the WSJ’s Nathan Koppel, in this article, asked whether gene sequences deserve patent protection. [read post]