Search for: "Robert Riley"
Results 41 - 60
of 424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 9:34 am
On June 25, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Riley v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:09 pm
Shuler had accused Robert Riley, Jr. of impregnating a lobbyist named Liberty Duke. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:05 am
“Modern cell phones are not just another technological convenience,” declared the majority opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in Riley v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:39 am
Check out footnote 6 (pdf 11), which leaves to another day CJ Roberts radical new reading of Section 5. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Riley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm
Is every police search now going to have a customs element to get around the Riley decision? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
Impact of Riley on pending cases. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Within minutes, there was more commentary on the Riley (as it will be called, despite the fact that Wurie would have made the case name far more enjoyable and available for lulz), as Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion, with a concurrence by Sam Alito, is one of those line-by-line stunners. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:07 am
In a completely preventable tragedy, a car accident in Union County took the life of Weddington High School student Riley Laymon. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:33 am
Roberts Jr. wrote in the unanimous opinion. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:52 pm
David Riley. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:44 am
Robert P. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
This concern tilted in favor of a warrant requirement in Riley: As Chief Justice Roberts noted there, “the Founders did not fight a revolution to gain the right to government agency protocols. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
Duncan Riley, in an entry on The Inquisitr, posted a screencast and video opinion piece dealing with RSS scraping and republishing and why it is not acceptable. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Robert E. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:33 pm
Roberts Jr. wrote in the unanimous opinion. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:33 pm
Roberts Jr. wrote in the unanimous opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:31 pm
” Robinson simply did not address a situation like that, as the Riley Chief Justice Roberts recognized in Riley when he described the administration’s position as trying to “extend” the 1973 case to cover a new situation that “bears little resemblance to the type of brief physical search considered in Robinson. [read post]
