Search for: "Robert S Kant" Results 41 - 60 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2022, 6:19 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Both Chief Justice John Roberts and at-long-last-retired Justice Stephen Breyer have complained in recent years about how an overemphasis on niche topics like, as Roberts put it, “the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria” has left much of legal scholarship unresponsive to the real-world problems that they, as judges, ostensibly have to deal with. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:32 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
Discussion Three Comments on Joseph Raz’s Conception of Normativity IntroductionGeorge Pavlakos Raz’s NexusNiko Kolodny Guided by Reasons: Raz on the Normative-Explanatory NexusUlrike Heuer Problems of Intellectualism: Raz on Reason and its ObjectsDouglas Lavin Reviews Five reviews of Rae Langton, Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification, with a response from Rae Langton Subordination, Silencing, and Two Ideas of … [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by David Lat
Some people — for example, Chief Justice John Roberts — are not fans of contemporary legal scholarship. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The article asserts, however, that Kant and Berlin’s admonition that all of humankind is "crooked timber" precludes officials from a privileged position, a postulate well supported by public choice theory. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by Dennis Crouch
  Info: Title:Justifying Intellectual Property Author: Robert P. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:41 am
Rev. 577 (1994).Star Trek and Philosophy: The Wrath of Kant (Kevin S. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 8:42 am
Philippa Foot--who opened my eyes to Aristotle's ethics and much else. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Robert Merges: how do you find members of the user community who can speak for the group? [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am by JB
She identifies this idea with the Golden Rule and with Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative, and notes that "it is a concept that is affirmed by religious and philosophical traditions all over the world," (p. x) giving examples from the New Testament, the Talmud, Edmund Burke, writers in Ancient Egypt, and Confucius. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
  The inspiring thing about Bill's vision (in contradistinction to Mukasey's) lies in a slight corruption of Robert Louis Stevenson's dictum that it is better to travel hopefully than to arrive. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:38 am by SHG
For me, these cases brought to mind Chief Justice Roberts' famous mockery of the contribution of scholars to actual law: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in eighteenth-century Bulgaria, or something. . . . [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:53 pm by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice Roberts said that Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar's position was "fairly radical. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:56 am by Frank Pasquale
It's a lazy recapitulation of the Times's ongoing crusade against law schools, right down to its citation of Justice Roberts's snide dismissal of legal scholarship as preoccupied with useless topics like "Kant[ian] evidentiary approaches in 18th century Bulgaria." [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:37 am by Schachtman
” A passage from Immanuel Kants The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is often paraphrased as “theory without practice is empty and practice without theory is blind. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:37 am by admin
” A passage from Immanuel Kants The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is often paraphrased as “theory without practice is empty and practice without theory is blind. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 10:05 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
We have some inkling what John Roberts thinks of the matter. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm by Sandy Levinson
Or Kant is sent to woodshed once someone can't explain why we can’t explain why we can’t like to Nazis asking where our friends are hiding. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:13 am by Larry Ribstein
   This discussion of practical vs. impractical theory segues with CJ Robertss much-blogged criticism of contemporary legal scholarship (echoing Judge Harry T. [read post]